DSOCOC Publications

The goal of cancer risk assessment and screening for HGSOC is to detect early-stage malignancies in the asymptomatic pre-clinical phase of disease, such that subsequent treatment will have a significant impact on reducing disease morbidity and mortality [3].

Recently, several lines of evidence indicate that the majority of ovarian cancers arise from the secretory cells of the fallopian tube [7-9]. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) constitutes the earliest morphologically recognizable form of HGSOC, and the distal portion of the fallopian tube (FT) is now considered to represent the site of origin of the majority of pelvic serous carcinoma [10-13].

Recent immunohistochemical and molecular studies have identified molecular alterations in the transition from FTE to STIC to eventual HGSOC (Fig. 4) [30].

Consequently, we believe that our focus on early detection of STIC/early stage disease, coupled with our strategy of ultimately identifying biomarkers in biofluids (e.g. serum, plasma) would allow immediate evaluation of novel markers in case-control studies and in longitudinal cohorts such as PLCO and WHI.

2. Young, R.C., et al., Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Results of two prospective randomized trials. N Engl J Med, 1990. 322(15): p. 1021-7.

3. Cole, P. and A.S. Morrison, Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1980. 64(5): p. 1263-72.

4. Buys, S.S., et al., Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA, 2011. 305(22): p. 2295-303.

5. Blyuss, O., et al., Serial Patterns of Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers in a Prediagnosis Longitudinal Dataset. Biomed Res Int, 2015. 2015: p. 681416.

6. Holland, W.W., S. Stewart, and C. Masseria, Policy brief: screening in Europe, in European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, W.H. Organization, Editor. 2006.

7. Crum, C.P., et al., The distal fallopian tube: a new model for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 19(1): p. 3-9.

8. Morrison, J.C., et al., Incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and early invasive serous carcinoma in the nonprophylactic setting: analysis of a case series. Am J Surg Pathol, 2015. 39(4): p. 442-53.

9. Perets, R., et al., Transformation of the fallopian tube secretory epithelium leads to high-grade serous ovarian cancer in Brca;Tp53;Pten models. Cancer Cell, 2013. 24(6): p. 751-65.

10. Kurman, R.J. and M. Shih Ie, The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol, 2010. 34(3): p. 433-43.

11. Labidi-Galy, S.I., et al., High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat Commun, 2017. 8(1): p. 1093.

12. Mehra, K., et al., STICS, SCOUTs and p53 signatures; a new language for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Front Biosci (Elite Ed), 2011. 3: p. 625-34.

13. Salvador, S., et al., The fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009. 19(1): p. 58-64.

14. Bast, R.C., Jr., et al., A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med, 1983. 309(15): p. 883-7.

15. Diamandis, E.P., et al., Reflection on the discovery of carcinoembryonic antigen, prostate-specific antigen, and cancer antigens CA125 and CA19-9. Clin Chem, 2013. 59(1): p. 22-31.

16. Gnjatic, S., et al., Seromic profiling of ovarian and pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010. 107(11): p. 5088-93.

17. Garcia, E., et al., Diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer by 1H NMR metabonomics of serum explored by use of a microflow NMR probe. J Proteome Res, 2011. 10(4): p. 1765-71.

18. Odunsi, K., et al., Detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using 1H-NMR-based metabonomics. Int J Cancer, 2005. 113(5): p. 782-8.

19. Sukumaran, D.K., et al., Standard operating procedure for metabonomics studies of blood serum and plasma samples using a 1H-NMR micro-flow probe. Magn Reson Chem, 2009. 47 Suppl 1: p. S81-5.

20. Berger, A.C., et al., A Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Molecular Study of Gynecologic and Breast Cancers. Cancer Cell, 2018. 33(4): p. 690-705 e9.

21. Gharpure, K.M., et al., FABP4 as a key determinant of metastatic potential of ovarian cancer. Nat Commun, 2018. 9(1): p. 2923.

22. Li, L., et al., DNA methylation signatures and coagulation factors in the peripheral blood leucocytes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis, 2017. 38(8): p. 797-805.

23. Hood, B.L., et al., Proteomics of the human endometrial glandular epithelium and stroma from the proliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod, 2015. 92(4): p. 106.

24. Maxwell, G.L., et al., Proteomic analysis of stage I endometrial cancer tissue: identification of proteins associated with oxidative processes and inflammation. Gynecol Oncol, 2011. 121(3): p. 586-94.

25. Pedersen, M.H., et al., Downregulation of antigen presentation-associated pathway proteins is linked to poor outcome in triple-negative breast cancer patient tumors. Oncoimmunology, 2017. 6(5): p. e1305531.

26. Teng, P.N., et al., Advances in proximal fluid proteomics for disease biomarker discovery. J Proteome Res, 2010. 9(12): p. 6091-100.

27. Buas, M.F., et al., Identification of novel candidate plasma metabolite biomarkers for distinguishing serous ovarian carcinoma and benign serous ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol, 2016. 140(1): p. 138-44.

28. Buas, M.F., et al., Candidate serum metabolite biomarkers for differentiating gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, and high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma. Metabolomics, 2017. 13(3).

29. Buas, M.F., et al., Candidate early detection protein biomarkers for ER+/PR+ invasive ductal breast carcinoma identified using pre-clinical plasma from the WHI observational study. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015. 153(2): p. 445-54.

30. Tone, A.A., Taking the Tube: From Normal Fallopian Tube Epithelium to Ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017. 60(4): p. 697-710.

31. Wang, Y., et al., Evaluation of liquid from the Papanicolaou test and other liquid biopsies for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers. Sci Transl Med, 2018. 10(433).

32. Giesen, C., et al., Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat Methods, 2014. 11(4): p. 417-22.

33. Schapiro, D., et al., histoCAT: analysis of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex image cytometry data. Nat Methods, 2017. 14(9): p. 873-876.

34. Law, C.W., et al., voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol, 2014. 15(2): p. R29.

35. Smyth, G.K., Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol, 2004. 3: p. Article3.

36. Shen, X., et al., IonStar enables high-precision, low-missing-data proteomics quantification in large biological cohorts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018. 115(21): p. E4767-E4776.

37. McCullagh, P. and J.A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. Generalized Linear Models. 1989, London: Chapman and Hall.

38. Bourgon, R., R. Gentleman, and W. Huber, Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010. 107(21): p. 9546-51.

39. Huber, W., et al., Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods, 2015. 12(2): p. 115-21.

40. Peduzzi, P., et al., Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995. 48(12): p. 1503-10.

41. Peduzzi, P., et al., A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996. 49(12): p. 1373-9.

42. Vittinghoff, E. and C.E. McCulloch, Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol, 2007. 165(6): p. 710-8.

43. Gao, D., et al., Microenvironmental regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in cancer. Cancer Res, 2012. 72(19): p. 4883-9.

44. Walsh, L.A., et al., An Integrated Systems Biology Approach Identifies TRIM25 as a Key Determinant of Breast Cancer Metastasis. Cell Rep, 2017. 20(7): p. 1623-1640.

45. Ziai, J., et al., Abstract 2089: Highly multiplexed analysis of immune cell subsets in non-small cell lung cancer: validation of protein and RNA analysis by the Nanostring Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) platform. Cancer Research, 2017. 77(13): p. 2089.

46. Toki, M.I., et al., Abstract 3810: Validation of novel high-plex protein spatial profiling quantitation based on NanoString's Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) technology with quantitative fluorescence (QIF). Cancer Research, 2017. 77(13): p. 3810.

47. Merritt, C., et al., Abstract 3955: Spatially resolved, multiplexed digital characterization of protein and mRNA distribution and abundance in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections based on NanoString’s Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) technology: applications to immuno-oncology (IO) and tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Research, 2017. 77(13): p. 3955.

48. Hinerfeld, D., et al., Abstract 5350: A comprehensive and integrated approach to genomic and proteomic analysis of FFPE NSCLC tumor specimens. Cancer Research, 2017. 77(13): p. 5350.